Why the Lakers Sale Isn't About Basketball


Issue 3

Opening Take

The Los Angeles Lakers are changing hands for $12.5 billion, and most of the coverage the past week has been about Mark Walter - why he's selling, what he knows, what does the timing tell you. Those are the wrong questions if you're trying to understand what just happened to sports business.

The right question is: why would Josh Kushner, a venture capitalist whose entire career is built on backing AI companies, pay 22.7x revenue for a basketball team?

Kushner isn't new to this. His Thrive Eternal fund made its first move back in April with a minority stake in the San Francisco Giants, built around a specific thesis - that certain assets simply can't be replicated by machine intelligence, and that as AI makes content abundant and cheap, the things AI can't copy become more valuable, not less. Live sports, live fandom, a building 19,000 people show up to on a random Tuesday night - that's the bet. The Lakers are the biggest version of it he's made yet.

Here's the part worth sitting with: Walter's own $10 billion purchase of this same team just 14 months ago was already considered aggressive at 18x revenue. Kushner and Iger are paying meaningfully more than that. Whether that's conviction or excess depends entirely on whether you believe the AI thesis - which makes this less a story about one owner's exit and more a live test of how AI money is starting to price cultural scarcity.

Source:Sportico - "Kushner's Lakers Deal Isn't a Hedge. It's Another Bet on AI"

What I'm Watching

Zoom out from basketball for a second, because the Lakers aren't an isolated data point - they're the third record-setting franchise sale in just the past few weeks:

  • MLB: San Diego Padres approved at $3.9B (this week)
  • NFL: Seattle Seahawks agreed at $9.6B (July)
  • NBA: Los Angeles Lakers announced at $12.5B (last week)

Three different leagues, three different buyer profiles, and yet the same underlying pattern: capital is chasing scarce, live, un-reproducible assets at prices that would have looked irrational just two or three years ago. I'm watching whether this is a genuine repricing of what "scarcity" is worth in an AI-abundant world, or a short-term liquidity event that cools off once a couple of these deals underperform.

Also on my radar, NBA franchise valuations league-wide are already being marked up on the back of this sale, since comps drive the whole model. Worth watching which mid-market team ends up being the next test case. And what does this deal do to the value of expansion teams in Seattle and Las Vegas, as well as the upcoming NBA Europe?

Insight of the Week

12.9x → 18x → 22.7x

That's the trajectory of NBA franchise sales multiples in roughly 14 months - last year's league-average multiple, to what Walter paid for the Lakers in 2025, to what Kushner and Iger are paying for the same team. Sports franchise values are set almost entirely by comps, the same way real estate is. When the most recent comp jumps that sharply, the implied value of every other team in the league moves with it - which is why we're already seeing analysts revise valuations for teams as unrelated as the Utah Jazz upward this week.

The lesson for anyone building an analytics practice around sports business: franchise "value" isn't really a bottom-up calculation of revenue and cost structure. It's a comps market, and right now the comps are being set by buyers who aren't optimizing for basketball economics at all.

Looking Ahead

A little different this week. Instead of upcoming industry events to attend, it's the two things I'll be tracking into the next week:

  • NBA Board of Governors approval is still outstanding. Worth watching whether the Lakers sale becomes a template other owners who may be ready to exit point to - or whether the league quietly signals discomfort with franchises getting flipped this fast.
  • Thrive Eternal's next move. Two sports stakes in under six months (S.F. Giants, now Lakers) is a pattern, not a one-off. If the AI hedge thesis is real conviction rather than opportunism, the next signal to watch for is whether Kushner and Iger go shopping again - and in which league.

Odell

Beyond The Whistle

For sports business leaders, operators, and founders tracking where sports and technology intersect. Every Tuesday: what's shifting across the industry - and why it matters before it's obvious.

Read more from Beyond The Whistle

Issue 7 Opening Take Texas Sen. Ted Cruz walked onto the ESPN College GameDay set this past weekend to lobby for the Protect College Sports Act - and got booed by the crowd. The optics were easy to laugh at, but the underlying question ESPN suddenly had to answer was a real one: when does a sports media platform become a political platform, and who decides where that line is?The PCSA itself is worth understanding regardless of where you land on it. At its core, the bill would give schools...

Apologies for getting this issue out a day late. Issue 6 Opening Take Last week Stan Kroenke agreed to buy the Los Angeles Angels for $4 billion. This is more than another sports team sale story. Kroenke doesn't buy sports teams. He builds ecosystems - and the franchise is almost always the least interesting part of the deal. As of early 2026, he owns approximately 2.7 million acres of land across the United States - more than any other private individual in the country. More land than...

Issue 5 Opening Take This week officially kicks off the 2026 college football season. When Penn State takes the field in their season opener against Marshall, the game will be the first big event for Penn State Rewards. As I mentioned last issue, Penn State Rewards is a loyalty program where fans earn points for attending games, spending at partner locations like Dunkin' and Jersey Mike's, or at Penn State athletic facilities. The technology is powered by Uptop - a card linked rewards...